Re: 2.6 on a 133
From: Bill Marcum (bmarcum_at_iglou.com.urgent)
Date: 12/30/03
- Previous message: psychobudgie: "Re: X problems with nvidia drivers under linux"
- In reply to: Aaron Gray: "2.6 on a 133"
- Next in thread: Aaron Gray: "Re: 2.6 on a 133"
- Reply: Aaron Gray: "Re: 2.6 on a 133"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:16:27 -0500
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:28:36 -0000, Aaron Gray
<aarongray@DELETETHIS.aarongray.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is 2.6 too big a beast to be installed on a 133Mhz PC ?
>
> Should you stick to 2.4 on such a machine ?
>
It's hard to say what's too big without knowing how much memory is in
the PC.
-- When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice. -- Otto Von Bismarck
- Previous message: psychobudgie: "Re: X problems with nvidia drivers under linux"
- In reply to: Aaron Gray: "2.6 on a 133"
- Next in thread: Aaron Gray: "Re: 2.6 on a 133"
- Reply: Aaron Gray: "Re: 2.6 on a 133"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|