Re: Any idea why this won't mount?

From: remove (1on1(remove)_at_email.com)
Date: 01/21/04 

Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:32:02 -0500

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:04:32 +0000, Lee Miller scribbled:

> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:38:04 -0500, Joseph wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:24:21 +0000, Juha Siltala scribbled:
>>
>>> In article <pan.2004.01.21.03.46.01.683803@email.com>, Joseph wrote:
>>>
>>>> /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c vfat codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0 0
>>>> 0 /dev/hda5 /mnt/win_d vfat codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0
>>>> 0 0
>>>
>>> Assuming the partitions are correct, and that the mount points exist, do
>>> you have vfat support in the kernel? Try mounting the partitions
>>> manually to see some error messages.
>>
>> Yes...and they mount fine with:
>>
>> mount -t ext3 vfat /dev/hda<number> /mnt/win_<letter>
>>
>> Jon suggested I try adding "auto" so I will give that a shot.
>
> It's highly unlikely that it worked...

bash-2.05b# mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c
bash-2.05b#

It mounts fine....

> you've listed two different vfstypes.

You have eye problems, right?

"vfat" is different than "vfat" ?

I don't believe so.

<clip>

> And if you had just listened to what others said in this group your
> problem would have solved already. We should not have to bend over
> backwards to get information out of you to help you solve *YOUR* problem.
> If you don't like the attitude you get from users trying to help you, then
> go *** yourself. Ignore the help and go back to windows.

The reason for my attitude is in -YOUR- attitude.

I suspect that you are simply one of those people who enjoy stirring up
defecation. 

-- 
-Joseph-
The easiest way to get over on a people is to make them believe that something
that threatens -YOUR- plans is really just a sneaky way for your enemy to steal
something from them. Now they will fight tooth & nail for you, and be no wiser.