Re: Anti-virus
From: nick (n_at_csdfdasdsfsdsdfsd.com)
Date: 01/29/04
- Previous message: Juha Siltala: "Re: Anti-virus"
- In reply to: Harry Phillips: "Re: Anti-virus"
- Next in thread: Molchun: "Re: Anti-virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:07:13 GMT
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:51:29 +1000, Harry Phillips wrote:
> Robert Hull wrote:
>> In message <r64ne1-off.ln1@news.myaccess.com.au>, Harry Phillips
>> <harry@hkjsfh.com> wrote
>>
>>> Is that why you don't need to run the equiv of "Scandisk"?
>>
>>
>> Most Linux File Systems have an fsck utility that is run automagically
>> after x number of mounts - this does the work that Windoze Scandisk was
>> intended to do, only more reliably
>
> Hard disks do develop bad sectors over time, they just wear out, so my
> question now is:
>
> If I am running a server for months or even years at a time without a
> reboot or remount what makes sure the disk isn't corrupting the data it
> is saving?
>
> Do we just hope that our vital data isn't saved to a bad sector? Do we
> umount/mount our patitions to get to to the magical number? Do we cron a
> job to umount our partition, run fsck, then remount it?
Why would you even think about running a server on only one hard drive??
It's like attempting to stay aloft in a jet plane with no renundant
systems, you will crash and burn in short order.
- Previous message: Juha Siltala: "Re: Anti-virus"
- In reply to: Harry Phillips: "Re: Anti-virus"
- Next in thread: Molchun: "Re: Anti-virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|