Re: (OT) One more user admin question

From: Peter Jensen (usenet_at_pekajemaps.homeip.net)
Date: 01/31/04 

Date: 31 Jan 2004 10:29:48 GMT

Joseph wrote:

>>> See my previous question.
>>
>> Joseph, why are you wasting peoples download quota, costing people
>> who pay by the number of bytes by the above *stupid response* and not
>> *trimming* the post?
>
> I wonder why you did the exact same thing directly above my message
> here...
>
> Message-ID: <slrnc1lj44.3o9.BitTwister@wb.home.invalid>
> Message-ID: <slrnc1lgo7.33g.BitTwister@wb.home.invalid>
> Message-ID: <slrnc1lj44.3o9.BitTwister@wb.home.invalid>
>
> All in this same thread.

Why did you need to repeat one of them two times? It's a pretty weak
argument that needs to be supported by misdirection. Anyway, those
messages actually had meaningful content. The "See my previous
question" line doesn't. If the previous question was in the same
thread, people would have seen it. If it wasn't, then it's too broad a
statement, and you should have included a relevant message ID. In any
event, your post was a waste of bandwidth and time. 

-- 
PeKaJe
Chicken Little only has to be right once.