Re: (OT) One more user admin question

From: Johan Lindquist (spam_at_smilfinken.net)
Date: 01/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:39 +0100

So anyway, it was like, 07:32 CET Jan 31 2004, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Joseph was all like, "Dude,
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:16:57 +0000, Bit Twister wrote:

>> Joseph, why are you wasting peoples download quota, costing people
>> who pay by the number of bytes by the above *stupid response* and
>> not *trimming* the post?
>
> Clean up your own back yard and quit playing god.
>
> Learn this Bit Twister...
>
> You send me some STUPID BS like this and it is going to be
> --->YOU<--- who ends up causing a whole thread of useless posting.

The amounts of text /you/ have posted in this thread just to point
out that someone else made something equally bad as you did are
staggering.

[snip 100 lines of childish gripe]

Not to mention the effort you put in just to try and prove that you're
not the only offender. For once, how about just going "yeah, I wasn't
thinking" and be the bigger person?

Consider this thread the next time /you/ make a comment concerning how
amazing it is that some people can't let go of an issue.

"sheesh", indeed. 

-- 
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.      Perth ---> *
 12:49:31 up 6 days, 20:25,  2 users,  load average: 2.23, 2.11, 2.08
$ cat /dev/bollocks                      Registered Linux user #261729
optimize extensible networks

Relevant Pages