Re: (OT) One more user admin question
From: Johan Lindquist (spam_at_smilfinken.net)
Date: 01/31/04
- Next message: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Previous message: Walter Mautner: "Re: giving up on mandrake"
- In reply to: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Next in thread: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Reply: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:59:49 +0100
So anyway, it was like, 10:47 CET Jan 31 2004, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Joseph was all like, "Dude,
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:39 +0100, Johan Lindquist wrote:
>>> Learn this Bit Twister...
>>>
>>> You send me some STUPID BS like this and it is going to be
>>> --->YOU<--- who ends up causing a whole thread of useless posting.
>>
>> The amounts of text /you/ have posted in this thread just to point
>> out that someone else made something equally bad as you did are
>> staggering.
>
> Yes, and I have done this deliberately.
[..]
> If you enjoy wasting bandwidth then keep it up...otherwise shut up.
So what you're saying (well, threatening) is pretty much
"If people complain about my behaviour, I'm going to spam this
group to show my annoyance instead of taking the hint."
I take it that's your 20 years in the it industry that are talking.
All at once.
-- Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> * 15:56:48 up 6 days, 23:32, 2 users, load average: 2.08, 2.08, 2.09 $ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729 reinvent 24/7 initiatives
- Next message: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Previous message: Walter Mautner: "Re: giving up on mandrake"
- In reply to: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Next in thread: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Reply: remove: "Re: (OT) One more user admin question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|