Re: Reiser vs ext3
From: MikeyD (m_donaghy50_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Next message: Walter Mautner: "Re: backup .kde"
- Previous message: Stacy Waldrip: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- In reply to: Randy Allen: "Reiser vs ext3"
- Next in thread: Styvaen: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- Reply: Styvaen: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:36:06 +0000
> I'm getting ready to install a new Linux system on my laptop. What are
> the advantages and disadvantages of ext3 vs Reiser?
Reiser saves space and generally performs better. ext3 is considered more
reliable.
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715/3435 has some benchmarks comparing
various filesystems for speed, various other ones I've seen show reiser
outperforming in almost every way. I'd recommend reiser personally.
- Next message: Walter Mautner: "Re: backup .kde"
- Previous message: Stacy Waldrip: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- In reply to: Randy Allen: "Reiser vs ext3"
- Next in thread: Styvaen: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- Reply: Styvaen: "Re: Reiser vs ext3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|