No OS security REALITY! Re: BROWSER CRAP!

From: Ralph (not_at_chance.org)
Date: 02/03/04 

Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:14:08 GMT

Sindre Valle wrote:

>
> "Ralph" <not@chance.org> skrev i melding
>> What Rhyme is it? wrote:
>>
>> >> > and some web surfing!
>> >> linux has supported web surfing for logner than windows, and guess who
> is
>> >> better at it?
>> >
>> > IE of course.
>> >
>>
>> BS. 24 unpatched security holes in IE!!!!
>>
>> http://www.safecenter.net/UMBRELLAWEBV4/ie_unpatched/
>>
>
> Guys! I dont want to be rude... But I dont give a *** about your
> preferences regarding browsers!!! Please answer the questions asked or
> make your own tread...
>
> Thanks!

this is a public forum, if you don't want a public discution take your posts
elseware. Since Browsers are indeed included with the OS and MS claims that
IE is an intergal part of the OS, then unpatched security holes in IE are
unpatched security holes intergal to the OS. If you think security is not a
valid discution when asking "Linux in stead of Windows?" that is YOUR
problem. I DO consider security of the OS VITAL in deciding the question
"Linux in stead of Windows?" I say, LINUX instead of windows because Linux
is MORE SECURE. Part of my proof is the 24 unpatched security holes in IE
an integral part of the windows OS.

If you have a problem with that, TO BAD.