Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR.

From: Mark K. Bilbo (y_at_hoo.com-amikchi)
Date: 03/20/04

Next message: bi-weekly: "A new reader? Welcome to alt.os.linux, read this first if you're new here (FAQ)"
Previous message: Sadid Shawq: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
In reply to: Sadid Shawq: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Next in thread: Mark K. Frodo: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Reply: Mark K. Frodo: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: 20 Mar 2004 01:11:23 +0100

Sadid Shawq wrote:
>> Bob Hyam wrote:
>> ^
>> Is that not something inside a womans vagina?
>>
>> Lol - he is a ***

LOL

--
Mark K. Bilbo  -  a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion

Next message: bi-weekly: "A new reader? Welcome to alt.os.linux, read this first if you're new here (FAQ)"
Previous message: Sadid Shawq: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
In reply to: Sadid Shawq: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Next in thread: Mark K. Frodo: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Reply: Mark K. Frodo: "Re: LINUX IS NOT POPULAR. NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POPULAR."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]