Re: SCP problem
From: Matt Bostock (matt_at_mattbostock.com)
Date: 03/24/04
- Next message: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: SCP problem"
- Previous message: EML: "Re: SCP problem"
- In reply to: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: SCP problem"
- Next in thread: Matthias Eck: "Re: SCP problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:19:41 -0000
Ah I see :)
Thanks Sybren!
Matt
-- Banging your head against a wall uses 150 calories an hour. "Sybren Stuvel" <sybrenUSE@YOURthirdtower.imagination.com> wrote in message news:slrnc619rv.1bh.sybrenUSE@sybren.thirdtower.com... > Matt Bostock enlightened us with: > > It just seems odd that I had to use the second solution; I'm probably > > totally overseeing something. Any tips? > > The difference between the two commands is this: with the first command > you tell 'scp' to copy a directory. The second command tells scp to copy > the *contents* of that directory. It's the difference between a dir and > the files it contains. I'm sure > > $ scp -r /backups/anotherdirectory/* > admin@111.111.111.111:/backups/anotherdirectory > > would have worked as well. > > Sybren > -- > The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a > capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the > safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself? --- No viruses found in this message. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 20/3/04
- Next message: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: SCP problem"
- Previous message: EML: "Re: SCP problem"
- In reply to: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: SCP problem"
- Next in thread: Matthias Eck: "Re: SCP problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|