Re: WHat OS for web server
From: Michael Heiming (michael+USENET_at_www.heiming.de)
Date: 04/05/04
- Next message: J.O. Aho: "Re: High load average"
- Previous message: J.O. Aho: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- In reply to: Benjamin: "WHat OS for web server"
- Next in thread: Benjamin: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- Reply: Benjamin: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 21:00:14 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Benjamin <bfabre_nospam@cedratnet.fr> wrote:
( top posting fixed )
> "Michael Heiming" <michael+USENET@www.heiming.de> a ?crit dans le message de
> > Benjamin <bfabre_nospam@cedratnet.fr> wrote:
[..]
> > > 17:17:05 up 5 days, 4:01, 3 users, load average: 22,30, 30,95,
> > > 457 processes: 450 sleeping, 2 running, 5 zombie, 0 stopped
> > > CPU0 states: 3,4% user 10,0% system 0,0% nice 0,0% iowait 86,0%
> > > idle
[..]
> > > This is the result of free-m
> > > total used free shared buffers
> cached
> > > Mem: 1006 996 9 0 83
> 391
> > > -/+ buffers/cache: 521 484
> > > Swap: 1004 329 674
[..]
> > Hard to tell, the box is almost doing nothing, 10,0% system CPU
> > is a bit much, remote guess, there's just some mount process
> > hanging and/or the kernel has some problems removing one or
> > another module. You did apply all patches, including kernel
> > updates for RH 9.0 available?
> >
> > I'd look at the output of 'ps faux' for anything strange, top
> > shows 5 zombies, which might be related.
Did you take a look? We can't look into your system.
> I cannot update the kernel of my RH9 beacause my /boot is full.
You are joking? If you are sure the new kernel will boot, remove
the old one. Or move /boot to /. Just update /etc/fstab,
/etc/lilo.conf and rerun 'lilo -v'.
> RH9 is outdated is one month.
> So I will intall a clean new OS.
> What should I use ? Fedora ? Red Hat enterprise (can I use WS or I need
> ES ) ? Debian (I never use it, is it different) ?
If you like RH, ES would be the way to go, I don't expect those
hits are a private homepage.;) There is www.whiteboxlinux.org,
based on ES 3.0, but then you need to compile patches, (src.rpm)
are available from RH, dunno if they work on this distro, albeit
likely. With the yearly fee to RH, you can access patches/extras
from rhn or with up2date. Support is also available(included?)
with ES 3.0.
Debian should be fine for you too, the differences are only
minimal, if you really know how your RH systems works, it has a
powerful package system 'apt' "Advanced Package Tool", you need
to get used to.
Good luck
-- Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) Remove +SIGNS and www. if you expect an answer, sorry for inconvenience, but I get tons of spam. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcay8AkPEju3Se5QRAuOPAJ9l2Gx9kp59wsMw8e14uTunKCLeTACeIWkv y9MXZ08lFQ3vCQeoSKkdcvY= =bWHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: J.O. Aho: "Re: High load average"
- Previous message: J.O. Aho: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- In reply to: Benjamin: "WHat OS for web server"
- Next in thread: Benjamin: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- Reply: Benjamin: "Re: WHat OS for web server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
