Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?

From: Joachim Feise (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 04/10/04 

Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:09:27 -0700

WTH said on 4/9/2004 18:29:

>>Why use an ancient technology (COM) when so many newer,
>>and open, ones are available?
>
>
> Ancient?

Yes. COM is ancient.
It even has fallen out of favor with M$. They now push .NET...

> BTW, the COM is open.

Huh?
The only open fact is that COM is based on RPC.

> Now, if you mean that Windows architecture
> for handling COM isn't open, that's a different issue.

There is no other architecture.

-Joe

Relevant Pages