Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?
From: WTH (spamsucks_at_Ih8it.com)
Date: 04/10/04
- Next message: Olivier: "Re: Switching to Linux proved disasterous for my firm."
- Previous message: Mark S Bilk: "Microsoft agent lies: "Switching to Linux proved disasterous for my firm.""
- In reply to: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Next in thread: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Reply: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Reply: Larry I Smith: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:33:57 -0400
> Yes. COM is ancient.
> It even has fallen out of favor with M$. They now push .NET...
I think you're confusing M$ pushing DCOM/MTS with COM. COM hasn't fallen
out of favor.
>> BTW, the COM is open.
>
> Huh?
> The only open fact is that COM is based on RPC.
COM is an open binary specification. You didn't know that?
>> Now, if you mean that Windows architecture
>> for handling COM isn't open, that's a different issue.
>
> There is no other architecture.
I spent 2 years at SoftImage using COM on Irix/NT. I must have been
hallucinating. It also exists on OpenVMS, Digital Unix, Solaris, HP-Unix.
You can write DCOM clients on Linux. Slow down with the confident
assertions ;).
WTH
- Next message: Olivier: "Re: Switching to Linux proved disasterous for my firm."
- Previous message: Mark S Bilk: "Microsoft agent lies: "Switching to Linux proved disasterous for my firm.""
- In reply to: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Next in thread: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Reply: Joachim Feise: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Reply: Larry I Smith: "Re: COM/COM+ Components running in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
