Spammers Want You To Believe That (Challenges from challenge-response systems qualify as unsolicited bulk mail) [was: the part in parentheses]

From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 07/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:50:51 GMT

On 31 Jul 2004 13:50:18 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
>

<snip>

> Or some idiot decided that (starting) to use a C/R system is a smart
> thing to do. Nah, you're right, can't happen!

Funny. "Idiots" that use C/R systems are the only people on the planet
that don't have a spam problem.

I think it is pretty obvious who the real idiots (or malicious liars)
are.

<snip>

AC 

-- 
Pass-List -----> Block-List ----> Challenge-Response
The key to taking control of your mailbox.  Design Parameters:
http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp ||   http://tinyurl.com/3c3ag
Challenge-Response links -- http://tinyurl.com/yrfjb

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Team player issues
    ... The fearfulness of gutless idiots is behind much of this baloney. ... demand 100 million dollars a year as they decimate their company and ... mentiion and their own awards. ...
    (sci.research.careers)
  • Spammers Want You To Believe That (Challenges from challenge-response systems qualify as unsolicited
    ... "Idiots" that use C/R systems are the only people on the planet ... I think it is pretty obvious who the real idiots ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Clear the Deck
    ... > An actual scientist comes in, takes one look at what's on the table and yells. ... >"Stop it you idiots! ... >the scientist and the potential for radiation poisoning. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: SLD920X radar detector/jammer - does it actually work??
    ... >>try to prevent idiots from doing what comes naturally. ... [additional snip - Geez, isn't there some middle ground here, snippage- ... Yeah, there are always the loonies, but perhaps you can ... > This is tough to do when many of the legislators are loonies too. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Building a Light Clock
    ... > I take your point, Randy, ... Idiots *never* take points. ... > so perhaps that can also account for the null result, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)