Re: Linux is free...So where is it?
From: DanielEKFA (sorry.no.em_at_il.i.get.vira.and.spam)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Willem van der Berg: "Re: Giving up"
- Previous message: wbarwell: "Re: Linux is garbage compared to Windows. It can't even be given away for free!"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Next in thread: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Reply: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:54:42 +0200
Mark wrote:
>>Why did OS/2 fail when it was "a better windows than windows"? Why did the
>
>
> Because it was a commercial product that needed some presence in the
> market.
>
>
>>Amiga fail when it was the best thing on the market? Why did the Tucker
>
>
> The same applies here.
>
>
>>fail when it was very far advanced over any other automobile made?
>
>
> Linux won't fail. It has no operational costs. It does not depend on
> market success. It won't get buried when its owner loses interest.
> That's why commercial vendors start to 'fear' it. No matter how slowly
> open source projects pogress... they will eventually absorb most if
> not all functionality of commercial products.
Yep, they absorb everything except the bugs. Ain't it beautiful? :)
- Next message: Willem van der Berg: "Re: Giving up"
- Previous message: wbarwell: "Re: Linux is garbage compared to Windows. It can't even be given away for free!"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Next in thread: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Reply: Mark: "Re: Linux is free...So where is it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|