Re: Linux is not free nor is it an overall improvement from Windows 2000.
From: Rick (none_at_nomail.com)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Insurrection: "Re: C.O.L.A. (comp.os.linux.advocacy) is a steaming JOKE."
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: New mandrake setup"
- In reply to: Gautam Bhayana: "Re: Linux is not free nor is it an overall improvement from Windows 2000."
- Next in thread: JEDIDIAH: "Re: Linux is not free nor is it an overall improvement from Windows 2000."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 21:33:53 -0400
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:15:13 -0400, Gautam Bhayana wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 00:04:49 +0000, mjt wrote:
>
>> Gautam Bhayana wrote:
>>
>>> All in all Linux worked great for the server side of the room but was a
>>> miserable failure on the desktop side.
>>
>> ... the failure point is with inadequate training/support
>> .
>
> Classic Linux technique of blaming the user when Linux falls flat on it's
> face.
> How come Windows doesn't seem to have these end user revolting problems
> like linux does?
You are obviously incapable of posting -specific- problems. But then, you
really didn't have nay, did you?
-- Rick
- Next message: Insurrection: "Re: C.O.L.A. (comp.os.linux.advocacy) is a steaming JOKE."
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: New mandrake setup"
- In reply to: Gautam Bhayana: "Re: Linux is not free nor is it an overall improvement from Windows 2000."
- Next in thread: JEDIDIAH: "Re: Linux is not free nor is it an overall improvement from Windows 2000."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
