ext3 vs ReiserFS
From: slo (DueSouth_at_linuxforum.net)
Date: 10/14/04
- Next message: JC: "Re: [Help] Linux physical address"
- Previous message: buckethead: "Linksys route administration"
- Next in thread: Joachim Feise: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Joachim Feise: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: ray: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Walter Mautner: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Peter Jensen: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Stephen Fairchild: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:00:14 +0800
ext3 is better or ReiserFS is better ?
why redhat defaulte filesystem is ext3 and SuSe,Gentoo is ReiserFS ?
- Next message: JC: "Re: [Help] Linux physical address"
- Previous message: buckethead: "Linksys route administration"
- Next in thread: Joachim Feise: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Joachim Feise: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: ray: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Walter Mautner: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Peter Jensen: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Reply: Stephen Fairchild: "Re: ext3 vs ReiserFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
