Re: Suse is NOT SLOW!!
From: Peter Köhlmann (Peter.Koehlmann_at_t-online.de)
Date: 12/12/04
- Next message: rapskat: "Re: Knoppix is real slow!!"
- Previous message: william olga: "Knoppix is real slow!!"
- Maybe in reply to: Ann: "Re: Suse is NOT SLOW!!"
- Next in thread: Ann: "Re: Suse is NOT SLOW!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:40:27 +0100
begin Peter Von Gasenhousen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:27:24 +0000, Ann wrote:
>
>>
>> "Peter Von Gasenhousen" <i_dont_use_email4103@nowhere.net> wrote in
>> message news:323r2kF3h43trU1@individual.net...
>>> If you don't preciously follow the documentations suggestions during
>>> installation you have nobody to blame but you and you.
>>> I compiled 19 kernels before I found one that fit all of my needs and my
>> system
>>> is very fast.
>>> If you don't make use of the tools that Linux offers how can you blame
>> suse?
>>> You must learn to read before you can even think about using Linux.If
>>> you
>> wish
>>> to be a pabulum puking infant use Windows.
>>> www.microsoft.com
>>> Peter Von Gasenhausen
>>>
>> So 20 attemps for you! When did you learn to read?
> I read the doc and tried different situations.
> I could have left Suse as a stock boxen but I chose to tuned my
> installation.
> You should read the doc and then get back to us.
Why should anyone follow the "suggestions" of a rather stupid crossposting
troll?
Tell us, Oh Wise One, what features needed to be compiled in which weren't
present in the Stock-SuSE-kernel?
-- This problem was sponsored by Microsoft
- Next message: rapskat: "Re: Knoppix is real slow!!"
- Previous message: william olga: "Knoppix is real slow!!"
- Maybe in reply to: Ann: "Re: Suse is NOT SLOW!!"
- Next in thread: Ann: "Re: Suse is NOT SLOW!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
