Re: Why Windows is Easier than Linux For An End User, Especially for Multimedia work.

From: rapskat (rapskat_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:30:23 -0500

Error log for Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:46:00 -0500: climinons caused a Page
Fault at address <nbtus0p0h7mhie7qfuddakfua3n07t0qe1@4ax.com>, details...

> "Why on earth would ANYONE spend a dime for
> Pro-tools/Cubase/Sonar/Waves/Logic/etc" when Linux, which is supposedly
> faster, on an Intel system is an option?

What, pray tell, does this have ***-all to do with "Linux"?!? Nothing,
nada, nilch, ninguno, zero, zilch, a big goose-egg, null.

You are talking about COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS that are developed by a
vendor for a particular platform. If said vendor doesn't create a version
of the product for Linux, does this imply some lack on Linux? No.

So, where are the HP-UX, Solaris, AIX, Irix, or FreeBSD versions of these
applications? Huh, what's that? That's right, THERE ARE NONE! Does this
mean that all of these platforms are "a joke" IYO as well? I don't think
so, natch.

If these vendors ever did port these apps to Linux, I can guarantee that
they would perform at least 10X better than on Windows.

Get a fscking clue, idiot. 

-- 
rapskat -  22:23:16 up 3 days, 12:14,  6 users,  load average: 2.27, 1.85, 1.64
Let him choose out of my files, his projects to accomplish.
		-- Shakespeare, "Coriolanus"
I am jamming to Prodigy - Poison