Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But...........
From: GreyCloud (mist_at_Cumulus.com)
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Previous message: Matt: "Re: I'm officially a Linux User"
- In reply to:(deleted message) flatfish+++: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Next in thread: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Reply: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:05:20 -0700
flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:33:47 -0800, Moe Green wrote:
>
>
>
>>Unfortunately many people confuse good audio with applications that have
>>fancy buttons.
>
>
> You're an idiot Bailo. You wouldn't know good audio if it hit you on top
> of the head like a brick falling from the top of the Brill building.
>
>
>
>>The same is true for stereo systems with lots of LEDs but speaker that
>>sound like vibrating cardboard.
>
>
> Like your Sound blaster 24 bit for example?
> You know, the card you couldn't make work with Linux?
>
>
>>Linux, to my ear, has the most powerful, crispest and clearest sound.
>
>
> A CODEC is a CODEC.
> The OS has nothing to do with it.
> If you hear anything different under Linux compared to Windows or
> Macintosh, you have different settings most likely due to your
> ineptitude.
>
> I notice that you make this claim over and over again and none of the
> Linux weirdos over in comp.os.linux.advocacy ever seem to correct you.
> Gee, I wonder why that is?
> They sure jump all over you when you mention a fault of Linux.
> However they ignore your obvious un-truths when they glorify the diety of
> Linux
>
>>I dual boot a Linux/W2K machine...so my comparison is with the same
>>hardware.
>>
>>The windows sound is flat, weak, and muddy.
>
>
> You have screwed something up.
> No doubt due to your idiocy.
>
>
>
>>The sound put out by linux drivers is strong, clear and clean.
>
>
> And if you did a double blind test with a properly set up system you
> wouldn't hear a difference.
>
> IOW your shit Sound blaster generates just as much hiss and distortion
> under Windows as is does under Linux.
>
>
>>Clearly, the Linux sound system was written by people who love audio,
>>and the Windos system by people who just wanted to get something out the
>>door quickly and fool people into thinking that they had functionality.
>
>
> Yea sure.
> Maybe they can get around to writing a decent help system.
> Programs that actually work?
> Some decent plug-ins?
>
> Come on already Bailo, you have no idea what you are talking about.
>
>
>
>
>>As far as the Mac...well, Linux is cheaper and better.
>
>
> See above.
>
> I'm sure the Mac crowd will love this one.
>
I do know one thing... the Mac that I bought earilier this year is
great. Even tho I've downloaded updates, I've yet to get any viruses,
spyware, or malware while running OS X. Wife kicked me off her Mac, so
I have to go back to using this old machine that uses windows 98. :-(
But I have yet to have the mac crash or have anything bad happen to it.
The sound is ok, but with my hearing going bad I can't tell the
difference between good sound and muddy sound. I just have to have it
turned up loud is all.
- Next message: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Previous message: Matt: "Re: I'm officially a Linux User"
- In reply to:(deleted message) flatfish+++: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Next in thread: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Reply: Snit: "Re: Linux and Multimedia-->The Potential is there<<-- But..........."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
