Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows
From: Kadaitcha Man (nospam_at_rainx.cjb.net)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: peter: "Re: 11-year old sisters installing Linux your time on a Linux Studio)"
- Previous message: Ranando King: "Re: Advertising "Linux Compatible""
- Maybe in reply to: billwg: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Next in thread: rapskat: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Reply: rapskat: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 3 Jan 2005 22:40:32 GMT
rapskat, <rapskat@yahoo.com>, the old, infectious female internal
reproductive organ, and girl aged 5-18 employed as a coal-drawer,
remonstrated:
> Error log for Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:02:29 +0000: Kadaitcha Man caused a
> Page Fault at address
> <075cd8c27e0c45bca398c300222934af@news-text.bhandari.pvt.np>,
> details...
>
>> rapskat, <rapskat@yahoo.com>, the second-class, picky gutter ***,
>> and employee who makes brooms from bundles of birch twigs, needled:
>>
>>> Error log for Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:48:24 +1300: Max Burke caused a
>>> Page Fault at address <41d8cecc@clear.net.nz>, details...
>>>
>>>> Why not try some REAL advocacy for Linux for a change
>>>
>>> You first.
>>
>> ... wrote the fucktard who oft proclaims "I am an advocate..."
>
> How many systems have you installed Linux on besides your own? How
> many organization and individuals have you introduced to it? How
> many flyers have you distributed about it? How many install parties
> have you hosted? How many ads in the local media have you mentioned
> it? How much of your own personal money have you donated to OSS
> projects? How many free lectures have you given about it?
Real Meaning: "Shuffle! Dodge! Avoid! Never mind me! What about
/YOU/? If /YOU/ don't do any of those things, then it's /YOUR fault/
that I am a complete failure and a laughingstock!"
To get any of those questions answered, cadaverene for brains, you must
first show where I ever claimed to undertake any kind of advocacy for linux.
You have already been given the reasons why I won't do it:
[QUOTE]
Tell me why anyone should advocate linux only to let ***-knuckled lunatics
such as yourself undo it all with your unthinking fuckwittery, pointless
boasting and slagging off at the competition? It seems to me that there is
great merit in dealing with you fucking idiots ever so severely beforehand.
[/QUOTE]
> You don't know anything about me, slot.
This is usenet, you clueless ***. Who the hell is there on usenet who cares
for knowing anything at all about you? *** me dead. How dumb can you get?
If there are no facts to smack your fuckwitted chops with, you stupid ***,
I'll make something up. How many times have you been fed that clue, retard?
It's just a matter of convenience for me that it is an empirically testable
fact that you tacitly admit to being a total failure.
Bad luck for you. Kudos to me. Deal with it, you mentally bankrupt
simpleton.
-- The truth about comp.os.linux.advocacy: "The _last_ thing I want is a bunch of Windummies begging for rescue from their own stupid mistakes** all of the time. Let 'em stay with what was created just for them: WinDoze." "Sinister Midget" in comp.os.linux.advocacy (news:slrncth9jj.e9q.sinister@home.harry.net)
- Next message: peter: "Re: 11-year old sisters installing Linux your time on a Linux Studio)"
- Previous message: Ranando King: "Re: Advertising "Linux Compatible""
- Maybe in reply to: billwg: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Next in thread: rapskat: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Reply: rapskat: "Re: 2005 -- We ust take on Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]