Re: how good linux is
From: Goat Tosser (NQGCUOFJDZXZ_at_spammotel.com)
Date: 04/27/05
- Previous message: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: how good linux is"
- In reply to: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: how good linux is"
- Next in thread: Beowulf: "Re: how good linux is"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:24:27 GMT
The voices in the head of Sybren Stuvel
<sybrenUSE@YOURthirdtower.com.imagination> caused Sybren Stuvel to write
in news:slrnd6unpd.30e.sybrenUSE@schuimige.hopjesv.la:
> They aren't alternatives. Linux is just better at a lot of things than
> Windows. It's no way an "alternative", just as a Renault is not an
> alternative to a Peugeot - they are just cars and you buy the one you
> like.
I was thinking that a more appropriate analogy might be the difference
between an automatic versus manual car - the auto allows you to cruise
without a great deal of thought about what is happening at the engine and
gearbox but the manual allows you better control at certain things.
Horses and courses ...
-- This sig free text brought to you by the letters s, i & g
- Previous message: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: how good linux is"
- In reply to: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: how good linux is"
- Next in thread: Beowulf: "Re: how good linux is"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]