Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?
From: pcbutts1 (pcbutts1_at_qmail.com)
Date: 05/12/05
- Next message: Mike Mol: "Re: The Sick World Of Linux Users. Happy Wanking in the Loo."
- Previous message: Davorin Vlahovic: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- In reply to: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Reply: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:06:17 -0700
Linønut" <"=?iso-8859-1?Q?lin=F8nut?= wrote:
> essteeaenn@worldbadminton.com poked his little head through the XP
> firewall and said:
>
>> non sequitor --- how many of the users of those 50 million copies
>> even know about the security holes? Unless an application includes
>> some sort of regular update service most users will never know about
>> such upgrades. Availability and convenience of security patches
>> does no good if folks don't even know about them.
>>
>> Or does Firefox include a regular update service?
>
> Yes. But even without it, users who like Firefox will periodically
> upgrade it. It is a freebie.
I paid for my copy.
- Next message: Mike Mol: "Re: The Sick World Of Linux Users. Happy Wanking in the Loo."
- Previous message: Davorin Vlahovic: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- In reply to: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Reply: Linønut: "Re: Firefox-->> 4 Major Security Flaws in 3 Months?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|