4 out of 5 Americans Agree

From: Herman Menderchuck (Of Roy Torkelson's ARMADA) (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 05/28/05 

Date: 27 May 2005 23:41:59 GMT

Apparently, Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in
news:d78g41$9ua$9@fluffy.databasix.com:

> On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:55:24 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local>
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:43:07 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: ping pj
>>> From: Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
>>> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.flame
>>> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 05:43:07 +0000 (UTC)
>>>
>>> jet@untool.net (jet) wrote in
>>> news:0qOdnRRSJqTI2gjfRVn-og@adelphia.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <slrnd9afv1.2kr.pjr@nntp.petitmorte.net>, PJR
>>>> <pjr@NOSPAMinsurgent.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday 26 May 2005, jet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>
>>>>> > In article <Xns9661CE3B824fkhall.databasix.com@130.133.1.4>, Fred
>>>>> > Hall
>>>>> <fkhall@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> jet@untool.net (jet) wrote in
>>>>> >> news:zMOdnVMU6dKr4gnfRVn-2g@adelphia.com:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Are you now an undercover DataBasix agent, or just the same old
>>>>> >> netabusing Jetsnuh? Why did you add a private hierarchy to the
>>>>> >> froups
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Why not? I'm not subject to the DB6 AUP.
>>>>>
>>>>> And anything done by you isn't abuse, right?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, non-abuse isn't abuse. My AUP says nothing about posting to
>>>> non-existant hierarchies. When someone who actually knows what net
>>>> abuse is tells me different, I will cheerfully comply. You're
>>>> beginning to sound like all the lusers who told Meowers anything they
>>>> didn't like was abuse or spam.
>>>>
>>>>> Ick.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cybernothing.org/faqs/net-abuse-faq.html
>>>> http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet/
>>>> http://www.cybernothing.org/faqs/dave-hayes.html
>>>>
>>>> Read some RFCs, too.
>>>>
>>>>> Please try to stay out of private hierarchies in future.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uh huh. Like... sdnet.*?
>>>
>>> Nope. Kronert came up with his rules *after* he refused to deal with
>>> abuse coming from his own network. I lived there which forced that
>>> frizzy headed *** to come up with other rules. BTW, it is propagated
>>> on Usenet.
>>>
>>>> altnet.general?
>>>
>>> Can I get it on other servers? I sure can!
>>>
>>>> Databasix is a non-existant
>>>> hierarchy on usenet.
>>>
>>> Wrong again, Jitjaws. You purposely did it knowing full well that it's
>>> *closed*, private and restricted.
>>>
>>>> Is it abuse to post to groups that don't exist, PJ?
>>>
>>> But the group you posted to *does* exist, ***. You knew it did and
>>> tried to abuse it. Fuckhead.
>>
>>I just posted to Usenet in the databasix hierarchy. Now would someone
>>tell me why Pan didn't warn me that the group databasix.general was not
>>a valid news group?
>>
> Pan's busted.

Unix/Linux still sort of blows. 

-- 
My mama was the cold north wind,
My daddy was the sun, 
Of a railroad man from west of hell,
Where the trains don’t even run...
You need to BeDoper
http://www.bedoper.com
Quantcast