Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!
From: WWDC (bewolf_at_cluster.net)
Date: 06/07/05
- Next message: WWDC: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Next in thread: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Reply: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:36:54 -0600
Unruh <unruh-spam@physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
> The instruction set for ppc and for intel are different. This means that
> binaries compiled for ppc cannot run on intel. Now one could put in an
> interpreter between the program and the hardware. But since there is not a
> one to one relationship between the instruction sets, it is slow. -- at
> least two or three instructions for every instruction, if not a lot more.
yes, but has a translation called Rosetta that solves most of this
problem. Most older PPC based binaries will work unaltered.
watch the keynote and it will make sense to you.
- Next message: WWDC: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Next in thread: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Reply: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|