Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix
From: Charles, Auriance (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/06/05
- Next message: Nog: "Re: Linux Banned At My School"
- Previous message: Rick: "Re: Bet My Business On Linux? I'm A Wee Bit Worried."
- In reply to: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:19:10 -0000
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:05:14 -0000, Michael Heiming
<michael+USENET@www.heiming.de> wrote:
>>> Why is this a problem?
>>>
>> Perhaps because he doesn't want to have to install half of
>> Gnome.... There are a number of packages around that use
>> either GTK or QT and installing the package often means
>> installing most of Gnome or KDE....
This is what I mean indeed :)
I don't want to have to load Gtk+ as Qt is already loaded with KDE.
> Seems as if current budget PC come with hds 80-200 GB, so what's
> the problem with installing 10 or more additional packages,
> taking a few hundred MB on the disk?
The problem is not the HDD space, it is the amount of RAM memory. Not many
people have more than 512MB.
-- Charles. Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ PC-BSD - Personal Computing, served up BSD style! http://www.pcbsd.org/
- Next message: Nog: "Re: Linux Banned At My School"
- Previous message: Rick: "Re: Bet My Business On Linux? I'm A Wee Bit Worried."
- In reply to: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: A few equivalent apps for Unix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|