Re: Considering switch to linux


"Andy Fraser" <andyfraser31@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1h8g32b.4x4jv6pimkg0N%andyfraser31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Joe727 <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The fact of the matter is, as a new user, it's clear to me that Linux is
>> not
>> ready for the desktop.
>
> Can all you noobs stop making such stupid and sweeping statements? What
> you really meant was the distros you've used aren't ready for *your*
> desktop because it's sure as hell ready for mine and many, many other
> people's desktop. I know this because we're using it on our desktops
> very successfully.
>
>> It is command-line oriented
>
> Wrong. It can be if that's how you choose to use it.
>
>> unlike XP, the MAC OSs,
>> and even the various release of Widows 95 through Windows 98.
>
> I'm using OS X right now and I can tell you I spend just as much time
> using the command line here as I do when I'm running Linux or FreeBSD.
> In the case of all three OSs it's there if you want it but you don't
> need it.
>
> Windows has a poor excuse for a command line but that may be changing.
> From what I've read Vista may well have a much better, and more UNIX
> influenced, command line when it's released. If that's true then it
> would seem that even MS have realised the need for a good CLI from time
> to time, especially for admins. It's just Windows users (as opposed to
> power users and admins) who have been taught to do everything via point
> and click interfaces who don't realise the need for a good CLI from time
> to time.
>
> Instead of spouting crap like the "not ready for the desktop" line why
> not either work with the KDE/Gnome/other WM or DE devs to improve the
> GUI or just admit that you've failed with Linux and stay with Windows?
> That would hopefully keep a lot of this noise out of the NGs so that
> those noobs who appreciate the work done on free OSs can get the help
> they want to make a success of their chosen free OS.
>
> --
> Andy.

You have your opinion about Linux. I have mine. What's the problem?
Unless, of course, everyone must conform to your opinion.

Again, I am not anti-Linux, nor am I pro-Microsoft. I just had hoped that
Linux would be further along than it is. After all, if Linux were ready for
prime-time, the $25 billion a year PC games industry would have all their
games ported to Linux. The fact is, they don't.

Joe


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What Linux really needs
    ... Linux is not in the equation for *any* of our several hundred clients. ... in an effort to /force/ sales of Vista. ... not being allowed the option to wait until the release of Windows 7... ... Sorry I don't live in your Utopian OSS world. ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: OT: who said on this group "try Linux" a while back?
    ... took an old 120gig drive and put latest release of Ubuntu on it. ... linux will *never* be anything other than a tech nerd curiosity. ... setting in windows that I couldnt do with a few mouse clicks. ... terminal, paste in this command, job done" doesn't matter which DE you are ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Considering switch to linux
    ... using the command line here as I do when I'm running Linux or FreeBSD. ... In the case of all three OSs it's there if you want it but you don't ... Windows has a poor excuse for a command line but that may be changing. ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
    ... >> You can't pipe a command into xterm. ... You can't pipe a Web ... desktop on Red Hat Linux almost 10 years ago. ... developed a working style whih really suited the Windows ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: PcLinux
    ... I never said Windows was more capable, I pointed out that it is just as ... I'm not bashing Linux ... It has been with unix since at least v7 unix. ... And the reason for the short command names ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)