Re: Linux, over hyped by the Linux community, discuss.

kobold wrote:
Linux, buggy and unstable at the application layer, always in some half
baked beta release even when it is declared stable, poor and often
lacklustre hardware support, rarely supported and seldom back by big
software developers and hardware manufactures, fine as a web server yet
poor as a desktop OS, not quite as secure and immune to viruses and worms
as many of the myths would have us believe, after all this time as a free
OS still with a tiny market share even though many of the Linux community
claim it to be far superior to the competition, the OS of choice for
paranoid anti capitalist anti conformist geeks, the Linux community are
often in complete denial with regards to the competition.

I have heard all these things said about the Linux OS and the people who
use it. Is there any truth in these rumours?

Is anyone willing to discuss these allegations sensibly without just
posting a load of abuse and completely one sided debate?

Bedtime reading for the troll:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/29/vista_eu_antitrust/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/29/ie_patches_released/
http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/19/ms_in_peruvian_opensource_nightmare/

Read, mark, learn and inwardly digest - then *** off back to COLA
.

Quantcast