Re: A new reader? Welcome to alt.os.linux, read this first if you're new here (FAQ)

Bit Twister wrote:

On Tue, 09 May 2006 15:58:49 -0700, matt_left_coast wrote:
Bit Twister wrote:

On Tue, 09 May 2006 07:53:22 -0700, matt_left_coast wrote:

Your statement, like so many here, are NONSENSE.

Yep, I can agree with you there because most of them are your nonsense
statements.


Coming from a person that ASSUMES that "share a folder" means "share the
".kde directory" a totally unsupportable assumption, then makes another
totally UNSUPPORTABLE assumption to think that because they want to
share .kde they want to share logins, I see no reason to accept your
version of NONSENSE!

So, now you take issue with what/how I think as a reason to distract
from the presented facts.

I see reason to doubt you can distinguish fact from fiction. It is NOT an
attempt to distract, it is a reason to DOUBT your claims.



Not at all. I try to deal with the BS answers and EXCUSES people like YOU
spew.

No, you deal BS out answers trying to bolster you lame excuse for the
use of test groups.


Just because YOU say it is BS does not make it so.



Not at all. Sinner's "logic" is that because someone else has done
something it is OK for us to do something. Even YOU should be old enough
to to have been taught that by your mommy.

More of your BS excuses. You made a CLAIM about what a FAQ is.

Yes, I do.

Sinner posted proof negating your _claim_.

No, it did NOT. Infact the first 6 items SUPPORTED my claim.

Now you are spewing nonsence about /Sinner's logic/
No logic was provided. Sinner provied PROOF your _CLAIM_ on the
definition of what a FAQ can be is WRONG.\


Can, not IS? What bull ***.

The paragraph was NOT A DEFINITION. It was a statement about how FAQ's were
used but NOT IF IT WERE A LEGITIMATE USE. But that paragraph was NOT A
DEFINITION.




Now when Sinner's provides ONE PROOF, you now /claim/ OVERWHELMING PROOF
your are correct.


But is it PROPER USE? Is it RIGHT?

You made a claim, proof was provide, you are wrong.

So, you are saying that the current FAQ could be an IMPROPER USE of a FAQ?
That is just my point!


Now you want argue _proper use_, that is just more BS.

In your ".kde" mind.


It is yet another lame try at trying to divert attention away from the
fact you have no grounds for complaint for suggesting the use of test
groups for test posts.

What I see is hate and anger because I don't buy your "humor" excuses all
attempt to justify your condescending lies about a persons test posts. And
yes, "humor" can be used to lie.

.