Re: forcing boxA to use gateway to get to boxB all on same sub-net...
- From: left_coast <void@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:30:12 -0700
en2guy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Before anyone suggests something like adding another network card to
the gateway and having them on separate sub-nets, I can't do that.
Maybe not on different physical supbets, but what about different LOGICAL
subnets?
Um, it has been a while and I can't remember if I did this on Linux or some
other UNIX, but you might be able to set up eth0 and eth0:0 on the same
network interface cards, each configured to have a different IP address on
different subnets. Not sure if Linux routing could handle it.
On your gateway I assume eth0 is configured to be 192.168.40.7. So on the
gateway use the command
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.41.7 netmask 255.255.255.0
Then configure boxA to be on the 192.168.40.0 subnet and boxB to be on the
192.168.41.0 subnet...
If Linux routing can handle it... As I said, it was a long time ago and I
don't remember if it was Linux, so I don't know if it will work, but its a
suggestion.
--
Dan C. Gets caught apparently Plagiarizing:
Message ID: <3ab7l3-tnl.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yeah, this is the type critical of me!
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: forcing boxA to use gateway to get to boxB all on same sub-net...
- Next by Date: Re: Wireless
- Previous by thread: Re: forcing boxA to use gateway to get to boxB all on same sub-net...
- Next by thread: why can't lynx save cookie to local?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
