Re: Max ram for linux?
- From: John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:06:53 -0500
mvephoto writes:
I always thought that clustering servers would be more efficient than
having one "uber"server?
I wrote:
Scientific applications that do not partition well. Or Oracle.
Michael Heiming writes:
Oracle wouldn't really agree, the "g" in 10g means "grid".
Right. A grid of 64G machines. Besides, if you are paying for Oracle
licenses anyway what's a few $100k more for hardware?
--
John Hasler
john@xxxxxxxxxx
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
.
- References:
- Re: Max ram for linux?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Max ram for linux?
- From: Michael Heiming
- Re: Max ram for linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's the best easy to use Linux OS?
- Next by Date: Re: What's the best easy to use Linux OS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Max ram for linux?
- Next by thread: Re: Max ram for linux?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|