Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:37:45 +0100
"Java Jive" <java@xxxxxxxx> writes:
I'd be surprised if you're right about that TBH, AFAIUI it's a fairly
standard feature ...
http://www.linuxcommand.org/man_pages/sed1.html
-i is an extension. It's not in the standard.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>---<jid:mina86*chrome.pl>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
.
- References:
- whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: tom
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: tom
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: Sybren Stuvel
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: tom
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: Robert Newson
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: tom
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: Java Jive
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: tom
- Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- From: Java Jive
- whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel Core 2 Duo and linux
- Next by Date: Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- Previous by thread: Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- Next by thread: Re: whats wrong with find -exec sed?
- Index(es):