Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 02:58:32 GMT
After takin' a swig o' grog, sk8r-365 belched out this bit o' wisdom:
Joshua David Williams said:
Ironically, nearly none (if not none) of these "intellectual properties"
were actually conjured by Microsoft. For instance, the first Start menu was
actually developed by Berkeley Softworks (See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC/GEOS)
Boy does the *ever* look familiar !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BBENS412.png
Did Msoft _ever_ do *any* original?
This is even better:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS_%288-bit_operating_system%29
A fully windowed system on the Commodore 64.
A few months earlier:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Windows1.0.png
Note that it supported only tiled windows (except for the dialog boxes).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_st
The screen shot is misleading, too simple. Full support for overlapping
Windows.
And the true kicker, probably the best of the circa 1985 lot:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga
(Disclaimer: I owned an Atart ST, not the Amiga).
I remember thinking, at a computer demo from an IBM enthusiast, what
crap Windows was compared to the ST.
--
The three Rs of Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.
.
- References:
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: Joshua David Williams
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: sk8r-365
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Prev by Date: Re: A new reader? Welcome to alt.os.linux, read this first if you're new here (FAQ)
- Next by Date: Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Previous by thread: Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Next by thread: Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|