Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: darklight <glen.herron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:22:05 +0100
sk8r-365 wrote:
Joshua David Williams said:
Ironically, nearly none (if not none) of these "intellectual properties"
were actually conjured by Microsoft. For instance, the first Start menu
was actually developed by Berkeley Softworks (See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC/GEOS)
Boy does the *ever* look familiar !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BBENS412.png
Did Msoft _ever_ do *any* original?
It's no coincidence that Microsoft begain going downhill at the same time
Steve Ballmer became CEO. The man's a fool. Unfortunately for them, they
have nowhere to go but down, especially since they started with such a
poor foundation as DOS.
Either you're being generous about Msoft "going down hill" in OS
quality or you intend that their market shares are diminishing. If market
share - good! If quality, then I must wonder how one declines from
the bottom.
and you wonder why Mr gates is taking a back seat these days
but there will all ways be room for windows people tend to
stick with what they know
.
- References:
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: Joshua David Williams
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- From: sk8r-365
- Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Prev by Date: Re: Posting using Pan
- Next by Date: Re: Posting using Pan
- Previous by thread: Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Next by thread: Re: Micro$oft ba$tards at it again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
