Re: The PPP negotiation failed, coz serial loopback was detected

Also, 192.168.0.1 isn't for a router.

Its the other PC's ip address (the gateway for my PC - for XP).

So I can get on the net. As noted in my previous post . When I dial up from
the other PC.



"Paul" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f5vecf$3d8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanx guys.

192.168.0.1 is the other PC here (I'm on an XP network). I'm 192.168.0.2
on an XP network.

I use it when the other PC connects to the net to get this PC on the net
thru the network.

And both PCs here have modems and both can dialup .

ok in pap-secrets, I'll delete the "'s as theyre before the
username and pw.

Ubuntu is on a separate hdd, (not on a partition of the hdd that XP is
on), Its got its own 20 GB hdd.
"Moe Trin" <ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnf86952.o4r.ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.os.linux, in article
<87abuksw1r.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Hasler wrote:
Old guy writes:
And this is wrong. You are saying that the Internet is reachable by
sending everything to a router located at 192.168.0.1.

Looks like an installer misfeature inherited from Debian. It asks you if
you have a LAN and if you say yes makes it the default route.

Can you submit a bug report on that? I've been bitching about this kind
of error since 1996 with Red Hat 2.1 which pulled the same dumb stunt. In
their case, they made the "last" usable network address the default
gateway, and the "first" usable address as the DNS server. I asked Donnie
Barnes why this was chosen - that wasn't even close to the arrangement
they had on their own network. "Just trying to be helpful, and we _do_
ask the user if the numbers are OK". The average new user wouldn't know
right from wrong, or what they want. The average user wants fries with
that, if prompted.

Second line, I don't know, as I'm not using Ubuntu. I'd look in the
/etc/
directory, and one or two levels below, and see if some file has the
word
'LinkLocal' or 'ZeroConf'.

Just remove the zeroconf package with ¨apt-get remove zeroconf¨ or
similar. One of the Gnome packages drags it in for no good reason.

Might that be the avahi crap? Absolutely great security hole. At least
when Stuart Cheshire was proposing this brainless idea (google for
draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-06.txt), he did mention a tiny
little problem in the Security section - something about getting 0wn3d
because of a 'search' term in /etc/resolv.conf. To bad that the
competing (and incompatible) concept from microsoft (google for
draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt.gz or the adopted version as RFC4795
which is INFORMATIONAL, not some form of STANDARD)) decided it knew a
better way to create a security hole - not needing a 'search' term.

Old guy




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [SLE] connection redundancy
    ... which is the router just this side of the ... >>because it's own gateway is still up. ... You'll also need three network cards to put into this Linux box. ... your internal LAN can route packets to the Internet. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Cant access secure Web pages
    ... and which need to be contacted via the Default Gateway. ... The Default Gateway being the software process that does the network ... Gateway (as set up by your ISP's DHCP packet to the router), ... me so I can send it directly (to the MAC address discovered by ARP). ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: way OT: route table
    ... The default gateway is at 192.168.16.1. ... or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the ... The private router is set up to pass all ... >your access router has an interface on ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
  • Re: please advise - problem with routing
    ... Actually, these are HOST addresses, not NETWORK addresses. ... I will assume that this means from the 192.168.1.x/24 subnet you can ... your Internet Router, and not related to routing between the two internal ... Gateway using Interface 192.168.1.12. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Adding a route question
    ... Do I have my network cards gateways configured correctly? ... Subnet mask 255.255.255.0 ... With one router it is ... > gateway" so no static routes need to be manually ADDED. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)