Why Vista was designed to suck...
- From: MarkA <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:43:12 -0400
I know I'm preaching to the choir, but I just came across this gem, and
thought I would post the link here for all to enjoy:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
According to this analysis of Vista by the Univ of Auckland Computer
Science Dept, Vista isn't really a computer operating system. It is more
accurate to think of it as a software system for enforcing digital rights
for the entertainment industry, that also has some OS capabilities
included. That is why, after millions of man-hours and billions of
dollars in development costs, the "user experience" is worse than the OS
it is meant to replace.
In essence, M$ expects their users to spend more money for hardware and
software to get a computer that protects the Hollywood execs, and works
worse than an older, cheaper system.
--
MarkA
(This space accidentally filled in)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Vista was designed to suck...
- From: Anthony
- Re: Why Vista was designed to suck...
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Why Vista was designed to suck...
- Prev by Date: Re: graphics programs for linux which is the best?
- Next by Date: Create user account from putty (Newbie)
- Previous by thread: Fedora Core 6 Install
- Next by thread: Re: Why Vista was designed to suck...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|