Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- From: "Calab" <myspam@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:31:03 GMT
eth0:
- static IP of 10.0.11.16 with a mask of 255.255.255.0
- connected to a router, which is connected to the rest of my LAN and a
cable modem #1
Is eth0 in the same subnet as the rest of the LAN ?
Do the router or the modems do some NAT ?
[...]
I've pasted the results from ifconfig below. You'll notice that there are
almost NO packets going out of eth1 and eth2.
These are probably mostly some ARP traffic.
This could mean that the machine default route is on eth0. What's the
output of the following command :
ip -4 route list type unicast table all
I appreciate the help...
ROOT:~#ip -4 route list type unicast table all
10.0.11.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.11.16
68.145.52.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 68.145.54.200
68.145.56.0/22 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 68.145.58.50
239.0.0.0/8 dev eth0 scope link
default via 68.145.52.1 dev eth1
default via 68.145.56.1 dev eth2
default via 10.0.11.1 dev eth0
.
- References:
- Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- From: Calab
- Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Prev by Date: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Next by Date: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Previous by thread: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Next by thread: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|