Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- From: Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:26:09 +0100
Moe Trin a écrit :
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.os.linux, in article
<BPAhj.53359$uV6.49818@pd7urf1no>, Calab wrote:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.0.11.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
68.145.52.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
68.145.56.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
239.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
Comment: 239.0.0.0/8 is part of Multicast, and only 239.192.0.0/10 is in
current use - Site Local stuff under RFC2365. You're also missing the
loopback interface, but that's not part of this problem.
The 127.0.0.0/8 loopback route is a local route and as such is in the "local" routing table, along with routes to the host own addresses and broadcast addresses. The "route" command displays only the contents of the "main" routing table. To display the contents of the "local" routing table, use this command :
ip route list table local
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: going insane trying to install DSL on vaio drive
- Next by Date: Re: Linux live CD / NTFS r-w
- Previous by thread: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Next by thread: Re: Traffic NOT moving through the correct network interface?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
