Re: any difference ?
- From: "Mr. R" <jon.doe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:50:29 GMT
Hi
Installing Linux Fedora asks you if you want to install the Linux boot
manager and replace Master Boot Record (MBR). I did this on my machine tha
has two installs of Windows XP. After installing the GRUB boot manager or
what ever it was and replacing the MBR I first have to stop the boot of
Linux. Then I get the very same boot menu as Windows XP installed earlier.
If the boot and MBR fails as it dit one time for when I installed Linux I
just had to make a temporarilly install of XP to another drive, hence the
two XP installs. That put back the XP boot.ini file as first choise.
I "think" GRUB replaces the MBR and the main boot on the C-drive but not
actually the first C: partition.
But then My Linux boot is on the first partition and my Windows XP are on
drive D and the forth partition of the first drive. A little bit messy but
it works.
I installed the second XP partion to drive D since that is a SATA drive. C
is a IDE. I store Cubase files on my third drive which also os a SATA.
Lars
"Wolfgang Kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:foik53$13r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I'm new , just in terms of posting to this group :)
what would you recommend for one who already wrote his own OS
(quite different to windoze, Mac, IBM and L'unix)
I got the opportunity to install SUSE 10.3 or (X)ubuntu 7.10.
Would any of 'em destroy my current boot-manager which allow
me to boot up either win98,winXP,DOS6.00 or (my own) KESYS (all primary).
I know L'unix uses GRUB, but I'm afraid it wont recognise my OS (type 4B).
TIA.
__
wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: any difference ?
- From: Unruh
- Re: any difference ?
- References:
- any difference ?
- From: Wolfgang Kern
- any difference ?
- Prev by Date: Re: any difference ?
- Next by Date: Re: any difference ?
- Previous by thread: Re: any difference ?
- Next by thread: Re: any difference ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|