Re: [xubuntu] Preventing mgetty from going defunct
- From: Unruh <unruh-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:30:21 GMT
jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:37:33 +0800, Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) wrote:
Is there something like chroot jail for calling
mgetty such that I could kill the parent when
mgetty going defunct?
Right now, I think mgetty, when called by upstart,
is being tied to init .....
mgetty goes defunct? I've never seen a getty do that. Maybe try agetty -
that's what I use.
Very bad idea. All authors advise the use of mgetty for answering modems.
--
[** America, the police state **]
Whoooose! What's that noise? Why, it's US citizen's
rights, going down the toilet with Bush flushing.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/27/bush_nsa_internal/
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/08/wiretap
http://www.hermes-press.com/police_state.htm
http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559597
.
- References:
- Re: [xubuntu] Preventing mgetty from going defunct
- From: jayjwa
- Re: [xubuntu] Preventing mgetty from going defunct
- Prev by Date: Re: [xubuntu] Preventing mgetty from going defunct
- Next by Date: Re:regexec question
- Previous by thread: Re: [xubuntu] Preventing mgetty from going defunct
- Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.25.4 and minicom [2]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|