Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- From: "sjohns" <sjohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:58:10 -0400
To: s. keeling
I am talking from the business computing standpoint. Linux is and will still
be confined to the back end.
"s. keeling" <keeling@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrngcei6a.5b9.keeling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.]
sjohns <sjohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
"icecreamer" <icecreamer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8dqub4lojggitcufd3s8lgtia8cdqamu3r@xxxxxxxxxx
Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
Troll.
To: icecreamer
Linux will never be a popular desktop OS, but it is and has been for
years a
Yes, it will. My clueless musician buddy, with a non-functional,
pirated version of Cakewalk, loves rosegarden.
Multiply by no. of Windows users. Most of them just haven't run into
anyone like me, yet. :-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
www.ohiofreenet.org - telnet://tek1systems.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro
- Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- From: s. keeling
- Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- From: Ivan Marsh
- Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: Spontaneous unclean reboots
- Next by Date: Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- Previous by thread: simple question for using multi-IP on Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Why is this newsgroup called alt.OS.linux?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
