Re: LightHTTd vs Apache

From: "J.O. Aho" <user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:26:11 +0200

Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) wrote:

Is LightHTTPd up to the job? Using it to run PHP and MySQL seems to be quite interesting...

Lighttp used to be a good option if serving static content, but the gap isn't anymore as big as it used to be thanks to the new MPMs, it can even be that Apache serves static content better, to be sure about that we need to see tests where they compare lightttp with apache 2.2.

--

//Aho
.

References:
- LightHTTd vs Apache
  - From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)

Prev by Date: Re: bash - pipe
Next by Date: Re: frugalware
Previous by thread: LightHTTd vs Apache
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread