Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Jasen Betts <jasen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2008 05:42:16 GMT
On 2008-10-30, J.O. Aho <user@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Beej Jorgensen wrote:
Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I usually removed most SCSI and network card drivers. If you could
reduce the kernel size to about 1 Mbytes, then you don't need a initrd
image.
I'm ashamed to admit that I don't know that much about initrd. I don't
use it (I don't think--no mention of it in lilo.conf--I just build the
few drivers necessary to boot into the kernel), and my kernel is well
over 1 MB compressed.
What's the size limit about?
In the old days there was a 2M limitation on the size of the kernel.
In the old days it had to fit in low ram (between 0x3c00(iirc) and 0xA0000)
Bye.
Jasen
.
- References:
- kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
- Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Dan C
- Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Beej Jorgensen
- Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
- Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: Beej Jorgensen
- Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- From: J.O. Aho
- kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- Prev by Date: Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- Next by Date: Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.27 is a disaster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|