Re: Slackware 2.3 was: Re: Linux on 486?
- From: philo <philo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:01:22 -0500
<snip>
Glad you got Slackware working...
It's a more complete distribution
Yeah, but as I said it was just for the fun of it, to see if it would
work:) Its not really usefull on a 250MB HDD since you have to leave out
alot of the software available on the CD. If someone want to try this
again I suggest a 1GB HDD. And get a Type II pcmcia card with LAN or WLAN.
But it worked and that is the reason for trying:)
Yes
I like fooling around with old computers just to see what I can do with them.
I have a 386 with a 40 meg drive.
It's got win95 on it. Note: A 40 meg drive is too small to use to install Win95. I actually installed it on a larger drive, then pared down the installation and copied it to the 40 meg drive.
No particular reason other than just seeing what I could do.
.
- References:
- Re: Slackware 2.3 was: Re: Linux on 486?
- From: Thunder (4920 Søllested)
- Re: Slackware 2.3 was: Re: Linux on 486?
- Prev by Date: Re: a little c programming that no works!!
- Next by Date: Re: Linux on 486?
- Previous by thread: Re: Slackware 2.3 was: Re: Linux on 486?
- Next by thread: Re: Slackware 2.3 was: Re: Linux on 486?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|