Re: latest STL
From: André Pönitz (poenitz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 08/22/03
- Next message: Me: "Re: Understanding gdb"
- Previous message: Kevin Easton: "Re: how do I determine the number of active CPUs?"
- In reply to: Erik Max Francis: "Re: latest STL"
- Next in thread: Robert Jan Schaper: "Re: latest STL"
- Reply: Robert Jan Schaper: "Re: latest STL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:54:07 +0000 (UTC)
Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> wrote:
> Come on, this is disingenuous. Yes, technically the "STL" is not the
> proper name that portion of the C++ Standard Library. But colloquially,
> even among those intimately experienced with the Standard, it is used to
> mean the portions of the Standard Library that are inspired by the
> original STL.
That's what the
"In sloppy speech, "STL belongs to C++" might be in order, especially
if the focus is on the vector/list/map containers, [...]"
part you snipped was good for...
Andre'
- Next message: Me: "Re: Understanding gdb"
- Previous message: Kevin Easton: "Re: how do I determine the number of active CPUs?"
- In reply to: Erik Max Francis: "Re: latest STL"
- Next in thread: Robert Jan Schaper: "Re: latest STL"
- Reply: Robert Jan Schaper: "Re: latest STL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|