Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?
From: Neal P. Murphy (neal.p.murphy_at_alum.wpi.edu)
Date: 08/26/03
- Next message: André Pönitz: "Re: OPINION: What are the best Linux C++ IDE's out there?"
- Previous message: Allen McIntosh: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Next in thread: Frank Sweetser: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Reply: Frank Sweetser: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 05:37:42 GMT
David Schwartz passionately intoned:
>
> Try locking all endpoints to the appropriate duplex settings. This
> sounds like a negotiation problem.
I would second this. In my experience, the auto-negotiation doesn't work
when connected directly (that is, not through a hub/switch. If I had to
guess, I'd think that NICs and/or the drivers are not coded to perform the
'hub-style' negotiation.
Fest3er
- Next message: André Pönitz: "Re: OPINION: What are the best Linux C++ IDE's out there?"
- Previous message: Allen McIntosh: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Next in thread: Frank Sweetser: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Reply: Frank Sweetser: "Re: SOS - why does an application work fine with a hub but not a switch box?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
