Re: CFO: Why ./configure?
From: Erik Max Francis (max_at_alcyone.com)
Date: 09/10/03
- Previous message: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- In reply to: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Next in thread: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Reply: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 17:24:37 -0700
VBDis wrote:
> Isn't it possible to write a shell script, that translates the given
> switches
> before passing the results to the platform specific tools?
Of course. And that is in effect what autoconf does, although it does
considerably more.
> My intention really is to learn more about configure and that stuff.
> But since
> it's quite a complex matter, I tend to mix up the various aspects and
> confuse
> the discussion. Sorry :-(
>
> Let me try to specify the most important aspects: ...
Why don't you just read the manual for GNU autoconf?
-- Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && &tSftDotIotE / \ Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds \__/ William Shakespeare, _Sonnets_, 116
- Previous message: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- In reply to: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Next in thread: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Reply: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|