Re: CFO: Why ./configure?
From: André Pönitz (poenitz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 09/16/03
- Next message: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: LessTif Release 0.93.91 is out!"
- Previous message: André Pönitz: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- In reply to: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Next in thread: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Reply: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
VBDis <vbdis@aol.com> wrote:
> Im Artikel <bjsgrd$soo$2@mamenchi.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>, Thomas Richter
> <thor@cleopatra.math.tu-berlin.de> schreibt:
>
>>> wouldn't it be easier to create a header memory.h ( as a symlink or a
>>> copy of bstring.h ) to gain the compatibility?
>>
>>No, I'm not the administrator of the system. I can't do that.
>
> Then ask your administrator to do that for you.
No system administrator worth that name EVER changes his systems at
the request of a mere user...
[He might have some inspiration from time to time and act upon that, but
that's surely not a response to a user request ;-)]
Andre'
- Next message: Erik de Castro Lopo: "Re: LessTif Release 0.93.91 is out!"
- Previous message: André Pönitz: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- In reply to: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Next in thread: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Reply: VBDis: "Re: CFO: Why ./configure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|