Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen (sparre_at_nbi.dk)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Sergei Organov: "Re: IDE for C++: KDevelop vs Emacs vs Other"
- Previous message: FLY135: "Re: IDE for C++: KDevelop vs Emacs vs Other"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 02 Apr 2004 18:27:10 +0200
I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Well, there's _always_ a bottleneck, _somewhere_, to limit
> > performance in any kind of system.
Unless the system is _perfectly_ tuned.
> Well, of course. But if you don't notice the bottleneck, is it a
> bottleneck?
If you don't notice the bottleneck, it is because you _are_ the
bottleneck. :-)
Seriously it is important to be aware that although we may call our X
server a "system", what is perceived as the system to the user is much
more than just the X server. It is also the local hardware, the
network and the application servers. Altogether it is likely to be
completely different from user to user, and any developer who is
serious about the performance should at least test the effects of
limiting each of the factors that can act as the bottleneck, to see
what can be done to compensate and how necessary it is.
Jacob
-- "It is very easy to get ridiculously confused about the tenses of time travel, but most things can be resolved by a sufficiently large ego."
- Next message: Sergei Organov: "Re: IDE for C++: KDevelop vs Emacs vs Other"
- Previous message: FLY135: "Re: IDE for C++: KDevelop vs Emacs vs Other"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|