Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?
From: Kenji Chan (no_at_no.com)
Date: 04/03/04
- Next message: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Previous message: Benny Hill: "Re: [ANN] ultimate++ 0.1.7 windows/linux C++ development platform - first linux test"
- In reply to: Grant Edwards: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Next in thread: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Reply: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:53:15 +1000
> A packet could get fragmented into two packets by a router.
>
> Is that what you're asking about?
no, not really. I assumed that the DF(don't fragment bit) is set, so forget
about IP fragment
I want to ask that, is that possible for an IP packet get shorter
// for example
sender sends 100 bytes
would the receiver receive less or maybe more than 100 bytes?
- Next message: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Previous message: Benny Hill: "Re: [ANN] ultimate++ 0.1.7 windows/linux C++ development platform - first linux test"
- In reply to: Grant Edwards: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Next in thread: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Reply: Tauno Voipio: "Re: would an datagram/packet get shorter?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|